About Me

Name: KsReaganite
Email: ksreaganite@cox.net Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Phill Kline was right!

Last year they fought us tooth and nail in Kansas when the then Attorney General Phill Kline charged that abortion clinics were protecting rapists and abusers. Millions of dollars of out of state pro-choice money got rid of that attorney general and replaced him with someone who would protect the dark secrets of the abortion industry. Well, guess what, we were right:

http://news.enquirer.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070510/COL05/705100319/1009/col05

The grisly business of the pro-choice advocates does not stop at infanticide. They go beyond mere killing to use their stranglehold on the bar and the bench to protect rapists, victimize molested children, and shield the worst kind of abusers. Pro choice=pro child??? Not in the life of at least one Ohio teenager whose cry for help was suffocated by Planned Parenthood. What else did you expect from people who make their living by killing children?

 

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Name calling bad..cheating good!

There is something terribly warped about a society that penalizes derogatory speech but celebrates spousal betrayal. The same people who demanded Imus' head on a platter for his offensive remarks are the first ones to say that betraying your spouse and family is a merely a 'personal' matter. I guess it shows the bizarreness of liberal thought processes which go like this: what I (liberals) dislike is immoral and should be proscribed; what you (middle America) dislike is just merely personal and should be given a hood and a wink. The message is this: don't you dare calling your South Asian neighbor a 'Paki' but feel free and 'enlightened' to cheat on your wife/husband.

And then they wonder why kids are so confused...lol.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Give it to Israel

I have often argued, only half jokingly, that if we let Israel take off its gloves, we wouldn't have to be so involved in the Middle East militarily. For years, the United States has restrained Israel when the latter rightfully needed to pre-emptively take care of the enemies of its existence. Out of concern for global sensitivities we have kept on a mild pressure on Israel to be 'nice'. And now the US is bogged down in Iraq and growing mighty concerned about being stretched thin should Iran need to be cautioned. I say, let Israel do the job. Israelis  have proven time and again that they can hit against terror and terro-sponsiring countries and entities with a precision, lethality, and effectiveness that is unmatched...yes unmatched even by the United States. Just take the pressure off Israel and let them do the job that will protect them, us, and the rest of free world from the likes of Iraqi insurgents, Iranian mullahs, and everything in between.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Vive le France?

Even France! Long the epicenter of old Europe’s anti-American attitudes, France elected a professedly pro-American president over the weekend. The victory was all the more sweet in that Nicholas Sarkozy beat the arch-socialist epitome of French degeneration Segolene Royal. On top of that, horror of all horrors to the rabid secularists, Monsieur Sarkozy claims to be a professing Roman Catholic who has expressed an open admiration for the late Pope John Paul II.

Observing in context, one hopes the conservative victory in France stops a trend of center-right losses across the continent where major countries like Britain, Spain, Italy, and Norway have all elected leftists to office in the past four years. Conservative parties in Britain and Germany, both coming up for elections in the next two years, should take heart from the performance of the French right. Come to think of it, so can Republicans here in the United States. Ideas matter, boldness pays dividends, and leaders who communicate a vision well, connect better with voters.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Atheists and Catholics

As I saw the mumbled, mangled, mealy mouthed responses of Rudy Giuliani on Thursday’s debate, I couldn’t help a comparison to Congressman Fortney “Pete” Stark of California. Stark, a very liberal Democrat from California, announced a few weeks ago that he was an atheist, thus becoming the first openly atheistic member of the United States congress. Congressman Stark’s political record and utterances have been quite consistent with his openly professed atheistic beliefs. The statement made by Rep. Stark was polite, direct, and consistent and thus engendered the due respect that a man of intellectual integrity richly deserves.

Giuliani was quite a different story however. In the same rambling sentence he said that he was a Catholic, hated abortions, wanted to keep Roe v Wade in place, wanted to overturn Roe v. Wade, supported public funding of abortions, supported the Hyde Amendment (which forbids public funding of abortions), was ‘pro-choice’, supported the partial-birth abortion ban. Now this ‘Catholic’ has been on records criticizing the pronouncements of the late Pope John Paul II and has been married a few times without the benefit of annulments. The question here is not whether Catholic beliefs are right, wrong, or bizarre…frankly the probity of the Catholic doctrine is irrelevant to the issue I have with Rudy: he is not what he pretends to be. In America, nobody forces you to be a Catholic or a Baptist or an atheist, you make the choice yourself. But common decency and sheer integrity demand that you are what you claim to be whether it is in personal life or the public square, in New York or in New Mexico.. in 1997 or 2007. It is that fundamental integrity and common decency that Mayor Giuliani lacks.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

War Fatigue and Big Macs

I am a firm supporter of the President’s actions in Iraq. The cost is tremendous, not only in terms of immediate lives lost, but also measured by the lasting effects of the war on the fortunes of the conservative movement. Thanks to the war, conservatives are fighting amongst themselves, liberals are winning elections they wouldn’t otherwise, and public policy being increasingly dominated by the ultra-left. This one war, has set back the conservative movement by a decade, if not more and wiped out many of the very hard won gains we made against the liberal left establishment since the Reagan Revolution. One wonders whether the President understood the nature of the people he led to war: his generation is not the same as his father’s. The amount and duration of the sacrifice, deprivation, and heartbreak that comes with real wars is not something that a generation raised on Big Macs, commercial daycare, and drive-by divorce can readily endure. That is the harsh, sad, ugly fact that serves as the unspoken subtext of 21st century America’s war fatigue.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Victimized Leftist Icon

 It is hard to imagine me agreeing with anything that Alec Baldwin stands for. The well coiffed actor embodies everything that is wrong with Hollywood: ultra-leftist bias, an elitism bordering on disparagement, blatant anti-Americanism, promotion of the most bizarre and looney causes. Yet, I cannot but find sympathy for a father, albeit that father being Alec Baldwin, who has become casualty in the American judiciary’s warfare on families in general, and fatherhood in particular. No other society has such a gaping distance between its professed values and public policy when it comes to families. A 35, 000 member cabal of tightly knit bureaucrats and family court judges draw their sustenance, prestige, and upward professional mobility from the destruction of families by promoting divorce, dispensing gender-based justice in true shari’a style, separating fathers from their children, and rewarding marital infidelity. The only countries which come close to such a sordid treatment of the father-child relationship are Canada and Britain….but those countries do not, at least, make ‘family values’ a national catch phrase reeking of raw hypocrisy. What we heard on the tape from Mr. Baldwin was a father who verbally snapped after facing the most powerful judiciary and bureaucracy in the world standing between him and his own daughter
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Safe, Legal, and Rare

Last  night two of my friends were very upset that a casino might be built in their mid sized wholesome midwestern city. One a liberal Democrat, the other a 'moderate' Republican both bemoaned the 'social cost' of the casino, how destructive gambling is on individuals and families, and the general immorality of it all. I was about to die laughing at the about face of their 'morality' philosophy now that it was a case of NIMBY. For these are the same individuals who scream hoarse about how the conservative Republicans are trying to 'impose' their morality on good and happy Kansas, how they should not be bothered by the morality of others, how the concept of right and wrong whould be left up to individual judgment no matter what the cost to society. With the straightest face possible I looked at both these wonderful people and said "Well, I believe casino gambling should be safe, legal, and rare." (I bet this argument would be just dandy in the the upstate New York town where the Clintons live).

Guess what? Absolute pin drop silence.

I love it when liberals and 'moderates' get twisted and tangled in their own weird webs of situational ethics.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The irony of AG AG

I must admit not being impressed with testimony Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez provided the Senate Judiciary Committee on Thursday. His answers were repetitious, his tone flat, and his energy clearly on the wane as he faced a very hostile group of prima-donna. For a man in the fight for his career and representing a very embattled President, Judge Gonzalez certainly seemed out of his element as he parried well prepared queries from the panel of lawyers who think they wrote the Constitution. The AG's shoddy performance aside, it was quite amusing to watch people like Teddy Kennedy (a drunken acessory to murder and rape), Chuck Schumer (a beneficiary of hefty mafia millions), and Dick Durbin (Mayor Daley's senator, need I say more!) cast aspersions on the integrity of someone else. Further irony was these pampered rich white politicos questioning the civil rights credentials of the son of a Mexican immigrant.

Only in the United States Senate!
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

A small step, a noble victory

On the heels of news of the most inhuman carnage of death at Virginia Tech, Americans were greeted today by a small piece of news that gave us reason to believe in the existence of pockets of decency amongst us: the Supreme Court of the United States uphheld the overwhelming will of the American people to outlaw the ultra-barbaric practice of partial-birth abortion. It is a procedure that is so gruesome, so ghastly, so torturous that the late Daniel Patrick Moynihan, one of the abortion industry's leading henchmen in the Senate, termed it infanticide and a majority of self declared 'pro-choice' Americans wanted it banned. But court after court packed with radical judges of the Clinton era struck down state level bans enacted by overwhelming majorities of Democrats and Republicans. Congress was left with no choice but to enact the ban at the national level which again fell prey to radical Clintonite judges on the apeals benches in the Ninth and Second Circuits. Today's 5-4 decision of the Supreme Court restores the overwhelming will of the majority of the American people who have said loud and clear that this goes beyond abortion: partial-birth (politely called intact D/E by its grisly supporters) is infanticide.

Let us not be fooled by this judgment. It is only a very tiny step towards the goal of protecting the life of the most vulnerable, helpless, and innocent members of our society. We have a long way to go and, as the 2006 elections proved, the path is a rocky one at best. Arrayed against us are the powerful forces of the bar, the bench, the aborion industry, the radical feminists, the entire Democratic leadership, mainstream journalists, and the noisy liberal wing of the Republican Party. Those interests have lots of money and lots of votes; unborn children don't have either.

But let us not forget the importance of the decision either. This is the first time since the abhorrent Roe v. Wade decision that the high court has upheld the right of the American people to protect even a tiny fraction of their children fromcold blooded death and dismemberment. Even if one life is saved by this decision, a noble cause has been served. The small victory of Wednesday is a victory that richly belongs to the tireless efforts of the hundreds of thousand of women and men whose hard work and selfless sacrifice over the last 34 years made possible the decision rendered by the United States Supreme Court on Wednesday, April 18, 2007.

There will come a day my friends, perhaps long after you and I are gone, that abortion will be relegated to the ash heap of American history like its cousin slavery was. That day is far away. But trust you me, it is there. This decision gives us a small measure of much needed confidence that that day will come. For there is a conscience deep in the American psyche that will wake up someday, like it did in the ante-belum era against slavery, and find it repugnant to affirm that killing a child is a mere choice worth a thousand dollars plus tax.

God Bless the United States and, may I add sincerely today, this Honorable Court.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Turning tragedy into farce

One of the by products of the tragedy at Virginia Tech will be calls by the clueless to chip away further at Second Amendment rights. Every shooting rampage by a madman gives the likes of Sarah Brady and the liberal Democrats another avenue to press forth their agenda of curtailing personal freedoms and Constitutional safeguards. The irony of this is the hypothetical scenario where some students or faculty of Virginia Tech exercise their Second Amendment rights of conceal and carry: the alleged killer would have been fried within seconds of trying to inflict injury and death upon others.

Pity, such commonsense lessons are largely lost on an agenda-driven ideological left that runs the roost in the Democratic Party and is making noises amongst the largely irrelevant Republicans of New England and Sacramento.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

They are Better Than Us?

Bill Clinton's daughter went to private school. Nancy Pelosi's kids went to private schools. Jesse Jackson's children, legitimate and the illegitimate ones, are going to private school. Teddy Kennedy's children went to parochial schools as did 'populist' senator Jim Webb's. And each of them has fought tooth and nail to stop ordinary Americans from sending their kids to private or parochial schools.

Why do these people not want ordinary Americans to have the choice and the means to send their kids to private or parochial schools? Who on Earth do they think they are? And how stupid are liberal activists who keep on buying the nonsense that Democrats care for the children or the poor or the middle class or anyone else outside the wine-sipping, lobster eating, New York Times reading, clueless zombies in San Francisco, Chicago, and Boston?


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

What Global Warming??

 It is the middle of April, the bloomtime of spring. Flowers should be blossoming, children playing outside, people strolling down Main Street Kansas for shopping and dining. Instead, it is snowing through the length of I-70 from Hays to Topeka and temperatures are frigid.

Someone ought to sue Al Gore, and his intellectually bankrupt and cowardly liberal Republican buddies. I am no scientist but freezing temperatures at the height of a Kansas spring do not scream 'global warming'.  Even the arch-liberal New York Times, the mouthpiece of the elitist liberal chattering class, published an editorial last month blaming the former veep for being alarmist.

If I needed one more sign of the bankruptcy of the liberal reasoning faculties, I found it on the bumper stickers of a car in front of me. Two stickers, side by side, without the hint of the obvious irony: 'I Love Baby Turtles" and 'Keep Abortion Legal'.

Sheesh...it is Friday the Thirteenth.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Extremist Republicans!

For as long as I have remembered the term ‘extremist’ has been liberally applied by liberals to describe successful, conservative Republicans. In fact, for many doctrinaire liberals any believing, pro-family, progun, pro-school choice Republican is ‘extremist’. To hear liberals, just about every Republican with mid-America values is ‘extreme’. What nonsense!

Well, now I have actually found a real extremist who claims to be a Republican!

His values are so out of touch with middle America that he makes Hillary look pro-family. This guy is for taxpayer funding of abortions till the date of delivery, confiscation of handguns, and forcing kids to attend failing schools. On top of that, this Republican thinks that people who take marital fidelity seriously are weirdly old fashioned. No wonder, he has betrayed his wives and children most blatantly and publicly while flaunting his sleazy mistresses.

Meet the only Republican candidate that makes John Edwards and Barak Obama look positively conservative: Rudy Giuliani
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does the state or doesn’t it?

My challenge to my liberal friends is this: do they believe in the fundamental right of a state to regulate which adult can marry which other adult? Yes or no? Because that is the crux of the debate about homosexual ‘marriage’. Be careful of the answer. For if the answer is yes, then we have just taken away any constitutionally sound reason to prohibit polygamy and sibling marriage between consenting adults.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive